“An individual must respect the command and control at every level to prevent power struggle and ensure smooth transfer in an ideal society.”
By the way, let’s talk about the command-and-control system (for which we had this preceding discussion of societal-organization-related strategy). For this, we have to consider an ideal society (i.e. in which there is a comprehensive distribution of capables in the societal stratification, from lower to upper level, with increasing capability level tuned with interest level, with the work-position similarity theory in place, an appropriate respect standard in place, and wealth being virtually unnecessary); in such a society, the command and control have a reciprocal relationship, i.e. command descends from upper to lower levels, while control ascends from lower to upper levels. This means that the instructions to follow are provided at every level from more capables to the relatively less capables (as the societal stratification is of a pyramid type, the upper organizational class is managing the lower working class in a step-by-step manner). The control is mainly by the selection of capables at every level on the basis of efficiency and respect level (both are under consideration). (i.e. a leader who loses efficiency or respect is replaced through the same selection by the level below him; this is how control ascends.)
From Power Struggle and Its Prevention.
